Command and control is about decision making, the exercise of path by a properly designated commander over assigned and attached forces within the accomplishment of a mission, and is supported by info know-how (the computers and communications part of C4I). The United States is aggressively exploiting these applied sciences with a view to obtain information superiority, with the objective of reaching better and quicker selections, and frequently projecting, albeit with Defence uncertainties, future desired states and directing actions to bring about these future states.
Command and management refers to the exercise of authority and route by a correctly designated commander over assigned and connected forces within the accomplishment of the mission. Command and control functions are carried out through an association of personnel, tools, communications, services, and procedures employed by a commander in planning, directing, coordinating, and controlling forces and operations in the accomplishment of the mission.
Command refers back to the authority that a commander within the Armed Forces lawfully workouts over subordinates by virtue of rank or assignment. Command contains the authority and accountability for effectively utilizing accessible
resources and for planning the employment of, organizing, directing, coordinating, and controlling navy forces for the accomplishment of assigned missions.
Computing and communications are two pervasive enabling applied sciences that assist C2 and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance. Computer systems and communications process and transport information.
Management is authority which can be less than full command exercised by a commander in a Defence Forum over a part of the actions of subordinate or other organizations. Bodily or psychological pressures exerted with the intent to assure that an agent or group will reply as directed.
Intelligence is the product ensuing from the gathering, processing, integration, evaluation, analysis, and interpretation of available data regarding overseas nations or areas. Data and knowledge about an adversary obtained by means of observation, investigation, evaluation, or understanding.
One necessary capability that C4I methods provide commanders is situational awareness--details about the placement and standing of enemy and pleasant forces. A mandatory component of attaining superiority in decision making, it doesn't alone assure superior determination making. Commanders should take related information and combine it with their judgment--including tough-to-quantify points of human behavior (such as fatigue, experience degree, and stress), the uncertainty of information, and the believable future states resulting from actions by each their very own force and the enemy--to make choices about future actions and easy methods to convey these selections in methods to facilitate their proper execution. In doing so, commanders are supported by instruments to allow and speed up the planning and determination-making course of, to attain the decision-making superiority envisioned by DOD.
And, of course, to be efficient, command decisions should be applied, a process to which C4I applied sciences are also relevant (e.g., in rushing up the link by way of which concentrating on data is passed to weapons, the so-referred to as sensor-to-shooter hyperlink). The development and use of the best instruments allow the commander to focus better on these issues associated with the essence of command--the artwork versus the science. As more and higher-automated tools are developed and persons are trained to make use of them, it should turn into much more vital to acknowledge the art of command as distinguished from the mechanics of the instruments used to provide information. More information at the Air Force Portal
on this subject.
Leadership was once about hard skills such as planning, finance and business analysis. When command and control ruled the corporate world, the leaders were heroic rationalists who moved people around like pawns and fought like stags. When they spoke, the company employees jumped. Now, if the gurus and experts are right, leadership is increasingly concerned with soft skills - teamwork, communication and motivation.
Some suggest that we expect too much of leaders. Indeed, "renaissance" men and women are rare. Leadership in a modern organisation is highly complex and it is increasingly difficult - sometimes impossible - to find all the necessary traits in a single person. Among the most crucial skills is the ability to capture your audience - you will be competing with lots of other people for their attention. Leaders of the future will also have to be emotionally efficient. They will promote variation rather than promoting people in their own likeness. They will encourage experimentation and enable people to learn from failure. They will build and develop people.
Is it too much to expect of one person? I think it probably is: In the future, we will see leadership groups rather than individual leaders. This change in emphasis from individuals towards groups was charted by the leadership guru Warren Bennis in his work "Organizing Genius" He concentrates on famous ground-breaking groups rather than individual leaders and focuses, for example, on the achievements of Xerox's Palo Alto Research Centre, the group behind the 1992 Clinton campaign, and the Manhattan Project which delivered the atomic bomb. "None of us is as smart as all of us", says Professor Bennis.
If they are adept at hard skills, they surround themselves with people who are proficient with soft skills. They strike a balance. The two most lauded corporate chiefs of the past decade, Percy Barnevik, of Asea Brown Boveri, and Jack Welch, of General Electric, dismantled bureaucratic structures using both soft and hard skills. They coach and cajole as well as command and control. The "leader as coach" is yet another phrase more often seen in business books than in the real world. Acting as a coach to a colleague is not something that comes easily to many executives. It is increasingly common for executives to need mentoring. They need to talk through decisions and to think through the impact of their behaviour on others in the organisation.
In the macho era, support was for failures, but now there is a growing realisation that leaders are human after all, and that leadership is as much a human art as a rational science. Today's leaders don't follow rigid role models but prefer to nurture their own leadership style. They do not do people's jobs for them or put their faith in developing a personality cult. They regard Berkley
leadership as drawing people and disparate parts of the organisation together in ways that makes individuals and the organisation more effective.
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
What Types Of Body Armour Can We Use To Protect Our Military Today?
Body Armour refers to protective gear corresponding to ballistic armour, armoured vests, body armour, ballistic helmets, demining armour, IED suits, ceramic, polythene and steel armour plates, face shields and anti-riot armour for the army and police around the world as well as in Military Defence.
Today, modern forms of body armor are called bulletproof or bullet-resistant clothing. Modern protective vests have been created to minimize the injury from projectiles from handguns, shotguns and rifles. With that, it is commonly worn by police forces, military and private security and civilians. The legality of the issuance of body armors such as bulletproof vests is dictated the jurisdiction of the state law and other government law-enforcement agencies. With the recent rise of urban conflicts, protective bulletproof clothing has offered a wearable and affordable kind of confidence and security.
In a world, dominated by a growing lack of respect, appropriate solutions are required. A Military Forum
to discuss it is simply not enough. A lack of inadequate personal safety measures can put a lone worker or frontline operative at unnecessary risk, and cause unacceptable injury or harm. Body armour and stab vests have therefore regrettably become a necessity within a number of domestic frontline professions.
These protective products are used by the police, military and private security corporations in over 35 countries together with the South African Military, South African Navy, Irish Military, Indonesian Military, Armed Forces of Malta, Chilean Armed Forces, Dutch Special Forces, Thailand Navy and US Military; and a number of police forces within the UK and US in addition to the South African Police Services, Turkish Nationwide Police, Saudi Arabia Police, Oman Police, German Police, Belgian Police and Bermuda Police.
Navy physique armour is obtainable in a mess of configurations: ballistic, stab resistant, dual goal fragmentation resistant and flotation. They are constructed from quite a lot of ballistic supplies, together with: woven and unidirectional (protect) aramid and high efficiency polyethylene. Something similar is used in the Avionics industry. The outcome is of great relevance to the question: 'Body Armour - Why?' The main risks areas highlighted by the HSL are as follows:
- Visiting people in their house or office to enforce legal guidelines, police the system or having to give bad news.
- Certain geographical areas or trouble spots are high risk, such as poor or run down council estates.
- Dealing with certain high risk individuals, such as potentially violent or aggressive members of the public, drug users or dealers, or mentally ill individuals.
- Dealing with frustrated and disappointed customers (e.g. customers unhappy with the service your organisation has provided)
- Working late at night.
- Evicting people from their home.
- Visiting clients in unfamiliar industrial and domestic premises.
- Visiting unoccupied buildings
Several more reasons can be highlighted, deciding not to issue potentially life saving body armour or stab vests even more controversial. Corporate manslaughter and corporate homicide laws as well as health & safety regulations have been rewritten in countries around the world, in order to protect those who serve and risk their lives for others. The high cost of facing potential legal action after a fatal or non-fatal incident and the cost of injured employees taking time off would outweigh the one-off cost of body armour. Assaults on personnel who are not wearing protective clothing also create bad publicity for the Authority concerned, not to mention the welfare of the person involved and operational problems resulting from the injured staff being unable to work.
In 2003 the UK's Health and Safety Laboratory developed 18 case studies and approached over 400 organisations of various sizes and across a range of different occupations. Very detailed questionnaires were sent and interviews were conducted by the HSL with the selected organisations and the information which they provided formed the basis of these widely respected case studies.
Yes, 'perception' is one of the most essential issues within personal safety, and I very much agree with the fact that overt body armour can often be perceived as very confrontational, especially when dealing with intoxicated members of the public or those who seriously dislike authority, your organisation or presence to begin with. For me, lone workers dealing with the public should be doing their utmost to express themselves as peaceful ambassadors within their line of work. Only covert body armour allow them to do exactly that, whilst still being protected.
Body armour is usually developed in quite a few designs and configurations. Some of the most superior armour options have been developed and can be found for each the male and female kinds and embody formed choices for max safety and comfort. This article explores the varied varieties of body armour accessible today. Proceed studying below to study extra about how they're used.
Basic function protective vests are designed as a fundamental armour vests for the Police and private safety companies. They supply entrance, back and side ballistic protection. Concealable Vests have been designed to comply with the contours of the physique and provide front, again and side ballistic protection. Excessive visual operations clothes have been designed for use by personnel who need to be simply identified equivalent to traffic police.
Police Assault Vests are designed for over-the-uniform wear, offering full entrance, again, side, neck and shoulder ballistic protection. They're typically utilized by Police, Military and Special Forces. Military Assault vests are designed to be excessive-mobility front opening vests and are to be worn over a soldier’s uniform. They normally have entrance, back, facet and shoulder ballistic safety; with ballistic collar and throat protector, and detachable groin protector.
Demining Vests have been especially designed for deminers and specialists within the Army and Police who search for mines and explosives. These vests are designed to offer the utmost attainable safety towards fragments and explosions from detonating mines. They provide front, again and aspect fragmentation protection; with removable groin protectors.
Demining Aprons are also particularly designed for deminers and specialists in the Army and Police who seek for mines and explosives. These fits are designed to supply the utmost potential protection against fragments and explosions from detonating anti-personnel mines.
IED search suits are particularly designed for specialists in the Army and Police who seek for Improvised Explosive Gadgets (IEDs). These fits are designed to supply full body protection against fragments and explosions.
Armour plates are normally made from excessive-performance metal, ceramic and light-weight polyethylene armour plates, designed to suit all these vests and provide safety against high-velocity weapons, masking NIJ Degree III and IV (armour piercing).
The fact is that there is always an 'unknown' level of risk due to unforeseen circumstances. Ordinary risk assessments might often conclude in the verdict of 'low risk', however these often very basic risk assessments are based on technical facts or 'on-hand information' only, and while I appreciate them, they often do not go beyond these facts. A risk assessment dealing with the activity of a lone worker having to enter someone else's property or deal with customers or clients on a one-to-one basis can in my opinion, never ever result in low risk. Whenever a lone worker walks through someone's door or deals with often unfamiliar members of the public at another location, one can simply not know who else will be in the house, who else might enter the house at a later point, what activities occured prior to your colleagues visit or who else might be going to interfere or engage in their conversation or argument at a later point.
If you were driving a vehicle and your petrol light comes on, indicating you only have a bit of petrol left. What would you do? Would you start thinking: Will I make it home or not? Some people would be willing to take the risk in this situation. In the workplace though, in my view, it is the duty of the employer to not allow their employees to take unknown risks of their own accord without the provision of gear and training to protect them should they make a mistake in their own judgement. 'Better safe than sorry' and 'Prevention is better than cure' are two great sayings, making more sense within corporate health & safety than anywhere else. I hope you would stop and get some fuel, simply because you want to be on the safe side. You might have made it, but you didn't want to take that risk. The bottom line is you cannot afford Devry. The fact that a lone workers activity involves a rather 'unknown risk' must urge key decision makers to remain at least open minded when it comes to body armour or additional lone worker safety training that can be made available.
Suggesting body armour does not mean we suggest you are in danger, we simply say that you will have a greater chance of remaining unharmed in the unlikely, but possible, case of something going wrong. Wearing personal protective equipment can be compared to wearing a seat belt when driving a car. We do not put the seat belt on because we believe we are going to have an accident today. We are simply acknowledging the fact that there is an exceptionally small chance that we might crash. Yet, if this chance becomes reality, you have increased the chance of survival by wearing a seat belt.
Today, modern forms of body armor are called bulletproof or bullet-resistant clothing. Modern protective vests have been created to minimize the injury from projectiles from handguns, shotguns and rifles. With that, it is commonly worn by police forces, military and private security and civilians. The legality of the issuance of body armors such as bulletproof vests is dictated the jurisdiction of the state law and other government law-enforcement agencies. With the recent rise of urban conflicts, protective bulletproof clothing has offered a wearable and affordable kind of confidence and security.
In a world, dominated by a growing lack of respect, appropriate solutions are required. A Military Forum
to discuss it is simply not enough. A lack of inadequate personal safety measures can put a lone worker or frontline operative at unnecessary risk, and cause unacceptable injury or harm. Body armour and stab vests have therefore regrettably become a necessity within a number of domestic frontline professions.
These protective products are used by the police, military and private security corporations in over 35 countries together with the South African Military, South African Navy, Irish Military, Indonesian Military, Armed Forces of Malta, Chilean Armed Forces, Dutch Special Forces, Thailand Navy and US Military; and a number of police forces within the UK and US in addition to the South African Police Services, Turkish Nationwide Police, Saudi Arabia Police, Oman Police, German Police, Belgian Police and Bermuda Police.
Navy physique armour is obtainable in a mess of configurations: ballistic, stab resistant, dual goal fragmentation resistant and flotation. They are constructed from quite a lot of ballistic supplies, together with: woven and unidirectional (protect) aramid and high efficiency polyethylene. Something similar is used in the Avionics industry. The outcome is of great relevance to the question: 'Body Armour - Why?' The main risks areas highlighted by the HSL are as follows:
- Visiting people in their house or office to enforce legal guidelines, police the system or having to give bad news.
- Certain geographical areas or trouble spots are high risk, such as poor or run down council estates.
- Dealing with certain high risk individuals, such as potentially violent or aggressive members of the public, drug users or dealers, or mentally ill individuals.
- Dealing with frustrated and disappointed customers (e.g. customers unhappy with the service your organisation has provided)
- Working late at night.
- Evicting people from their home.
- Visiting clients in unfamiliar industrial and domestic premises.
- Visiting unoccupied buildings
Several more reasons can be highlighted, deciding not to issue potentially life saving body armour or stab vests even more controversial. Corporate manslaughter and corporate homicide laws as well as health & safety regulations have been rewritten in countries around the world, in order to protect those who serve and risk their lives for others. The high cost of facing potential legal action after a fatal or non-fatal incident and the cost of injured employees taking time off would outweigh the one-off cost of body armour. Assaults on personnel who are not wearing protective clothing also create bad publicity for the Authority concerned, not to mention the welfare of the person involved and operational problems resulting from the injured staff being unable to work.
In 2003 the UK's Health and Safety Laboratory developed 18 case studies and approached over 400 organisations of various sizes and across a range of different occupations. Very detailed questionnaires were sent and interviews were conducted by the HSL with the selected organisations and the information which they provided formed the basis of these widely respected case studies.
Yes, 'perception' is one of the most essential issues within personal safety, and I very much agree with the fact that overt body armour can often be perceived as very confrontational, especially when dealing with intoxicated members of the public or those who seriously dislike authority, your organisation or presence to begin with. For me, lone workers dealing with the public should be doing their utmost to express themselves as peaceful ambassadors within their line of work. Only covert body armour allow them to do exactly that, whilst still being protected.
Body armour is usually developed in quite a few designs and configurations. Some of the most superior armour options have been developed and can be found for each the male and female kinds and embody formed choices for max safety and comfort. This article explores the varied varieties of body armour accessible today. Proceed studying below to study extra about how they're used.
Basic function protective vests are designed as a fundamental armour vests for the Police and private safety companies. They supply entrance, back and side ballistic protection. Concealable Vests have been designed to comply with the contours of the physique and provide front, again and side ballistic protection. Excessive visual operations clothes have been designed for use by personnel who need to be simply identified equivalent to traffic police.
Police Assault Vests are designed for over-the-uniform wear, offering full entrance, again, side, neck and shoulder ballistic protection. They're typically utilized by Police, Military and Special Forces. Military Assault vests are designed to be excessive-mobility front opening vests and are to be worn over a soldier’s uniform. They normally have entrance, back, facet and shoulder ballistic safety; with ballistic collar and throat protector, and detachable groin protector.
Demining Vests have been especially designed for deminers and specialists within the Army and Police who search for mines and explosives. These vests are designed to offer the utmost attainable safety towards fragments and explosions from detonating mines. They provide front, again and aspect fragmentation protection; with removable groin protectors.
Demining Aprons are also particularly designed for deminers and specialists in the Army and Police who seek for mines and explosives. These fits are designed to supply the utmost potential protection against fragments and explosions from detonating anti-personnel mines.
IED search suits are particularly designed for specialists in the Army and Police who seek for Improvised Explosive Gadgets (IEDs). These fits are designed to supply full body protection against fragments and explosions.
Armour plates are normally made from excessive-performance metal, ceramic and light-weight polyethylene armour plates, designed to suit all these vests and provide safety against high-velocity weapons, masking NIJ Degree III and IV (armour piercing).
The fact is that there is always an 'unknown' level of risk due to unforeseen circumstances. Ordinary risk assessments might often conclude in the verdict of 'low risk', however these often very basic risk assessments are based on technical facts or 'on-hand information' only, and while I appreciate them, they often do not go beyond these facts. A risk assessment dealing with the activity of a lone worker having to enter someone else's property or deal with customers or clients on a one-to-one basis can in my opinion, never ever result in low risk. Whenever a lone worker walks through someone's door or deals with often unfamiliar members of the public at another location, one can simply not know who else will be in the house, who else might enter the house at a later point, what activities occured prior to your colleagues visit or who else might be going to interfere or engage in their conversation or argument at a later point.
If you were driving a vehicle and your petrol light comes on, indicating you only have a bit of petrol left. What would you do? Would you start thinking: Will I make it home or not? Some people would be willing to take the risk in this situation. In the workplace though, in my view, it is the duty of the employer to not allow their employees to take unknown risks of their own accord without the provision of gear and training to protect them should they make a mistake in their own judgement. 'Better safe than sorry' and 'Prevention is better than cure' are two great sayings, making more sense within corporate health & safety than anywhere else. I hope you would stop and get some fuel, simply because you want to be on the safe side. You might have made it, but you didn't want to take that risk. The bottom line is you cannot afford Devry. The fact that a lone workers activity involves a rather 'unknown risk' must urge key decision makers to remain at least open minded when it comes to body armour or additional lone worker safety training that can be made available.
Suggesting body armour does not mean we suggest you are in danger, we simply say that you will have a greater chance of remaining unharmed in the unlikely, but possible, case of something going wrong. Wearing personal protective equipment can be compared to wearing a seat belt when driving a car. We do not put the seat belt on because we believe we are going to have an accident today. We are simply acknowledging the fact that there is an exceptionally small chance that we might crash. Yet, if this chance becomes reality, you have increased the chance of survival by wearing a seat belt.
Why Do States Feel They Must Have Armed Forces?
It's a fact that Military
defence has a number of completely different meanings dependent on what criteria you apply the reference to.
Without a doubt, the term "defense is just another way of describing a battle, used by governments to replicate their non-aggressive posture in their region which does not carry the detrimental connotation of battle, resembling Ministry or Department of Defense.
In navy operations planning, a defensive strategy is the coverage of preventing an attack, or minimizing the injury of an assault, by the forces assuming protection in strategic depth for stopping an enemy from conquering territory. Within the scope of a national defense policy, defense is used to include most military issues.
Defence tactics are employed by nations for numerous reasons. For instance, an excellent example of using defensive technique tactics might be seen when used towards American troopers within the Vietnam Conflict.
By way of smaller cell guerrilla forces the Vietcong waged a warfare on the sources of the American soldiers, which included destroying supplies and supply routes. They also used the Individuals resources including Military Tanks
when producing booby traps, together with discarded items equivalent to tin cans in addition to unexploded bombs which they might gather and use for mines. These
Defensive army technique can also be hugely apparent in the arms race, and more just lately the nuclear arms race. The opinion being that with a nation holding such powerful weapons it might be inadvisable to assault except in fact the offensive nation holds weapons of an identical nature.
The role of military defence has been gradually shifted away from its primary role of providing security to enhancing commercial interest. With industrial growth and advancement of science,technology and Avionics the defence production led to a market oriented producer- purchaser relation between the developed and developing countries.The poor nation afflicted with conflicts became a super market for defence deals. For the powerful, military prowess which was earlier synonymous with political power has become a trademark of economic power.
Nowhere is this example extra outlined than within the Cold War stand offs of the mid to late twentieth century. One specific example of that is the Cuban Missile Crisis which involved the US and the Soviet Union in 1962. The Soviet and Cuban authorities had positioned nuclear weapons on Cuba as seen by American reconnaissance planes and, with the stress between the 2 nations already palpable, a standoff ensued with the 'very actual' menace of a nuclear warfare occurring. Luckily diplomatic proceedings ensured that the disaster was settled relatively amicably with the dismantling of the weaponry and a no-invasion settlement in place from the American authorities.
But restraining factors were at work. The intellectual circle and the knowledge acquired from past experiences as also the active international diplomacy successfully trained the world community to disarm for peace and development. The agreement to network for wealth through friendly trades and to address conflicts through peaceful dialogues have been endorsed vehemently.
Resource is scarce and is even scarcer with rising population particularly in poor countries which are already afflicted with hunger, illiteracy and joblessness. For these countries, the preparation for an impending war, which may never occur, is a sheer wastage of precious resource in terms of man, money and material.
The political compulsions may tempt the authority to take pride in the toughness of the defence force. The military men pride themselves as the savior of the country. With due respect and regard to the defence services, I have a considered opinion to express. I think military might is an outdated notion of exalting the national self esteem. Recent history of military powers have confirmed the fatality of this approach. The pride of the nation is in the human asset and any nation that failed to nurture its most precious asset will lose its national pride even if it owns the most sophisticated war weapons to erase the entire human race.
Big defence budgets in the developed world may entail an economic investment return out of defence production and sale exports. But how long can this go on? For poor countries, big defence budget produces a negative return, and hits the belly of the poor as his pie is taken away with every military purchase.In the new age, the defence security trade mark will diminish as more focus is now on economic security and sustainability of the future. The creative and innovative thinking to meet the future challenges will be a supreme consideration while war weapons will be valueless in the approaching apocalypse.You should definitely check Ctcd for more information.
There are some folks who believe that the United States goes out of its way to start wars, but is that really a fair assessment? No, not really, still it's not to say that a rogue nation-state despot or dictator should go out of their way to provoke us either. Not long ago, I was discussing this with an acquaintance, and they indicated that; "without wars, the defense industry would not exist in the end."
The thing is, they don't care what they build really; they just get a contract and set up a project management team, make prototypes, and then manufacture. They could make day-care centers for kids or military bases, they don't care. It's like lawyers, if they cannot practice one type of law, they will try to sue you for something else. We don't live in a world where there is not some crisis to take care of.
Further, I don't see nations with nukes as so bad, more I am worried about lunatic dictators, or terrorists having them. I'd rather the world didn't have nuclear weapons at all, but since so many nations do, and more will soon follow, I very much doubt any nation will get rid of them, because they will want to be able to protect themselves, against the last nation that refuses to get rid of them. Now then, my acquaintance states the obvious;
In my personal library I have almost a whole row of books on the topic of nuclear proliferation, the Cold War, and many reports put forth during the Cold War by the Rand Corporation. I believe it is scary stuff, and it's quite unfortunate, but it is what it is and we must deal with it without blinders. Please consider all this and think on it. If you have any comments, questions, or concerns you may e-mail me. I will not accept e-mails from anti-nuclear power activists.
defence has a number of completely different meanings dependent on what criteria you apply the reference to.
Without a doubt, the term "defense is just another way of describing a battle, used by governments to replicate their non-aggressive posture in their region which does not carry the detrimental connotation of battle, resembling Ministry or Department of Defense.
In navy operations planning, a defensive strategy is the coverage of preventing an attack, or minimizing the injury of an assault, by the forces assuming protection in strategic depth for stopping an enemy from conquering territory. Within the scope of a national defense policy, defense is used to include most military issues.
Defence tactics are employed by nations for numerous reasons. For instance, an excellent example of using defensive technique tactics might be seen when used towards American troopers within the Vietnam Conflict.
By way of smaller cell guerrilla forces the Vietcong waged a warfare on the sources of the American soldiers, which included destroying supplies and supply routes. They also used the Individuals resources including Military Tanks
when producing booby traps, together with discarded items equivalent to tin cans in addition to unexploded bombs which they might gather and use for mines. These
Defensive army technique can also be hugely apparent in the arms race, and more just lately the nuclear arms race. The opinion being that with a nation holding such powerful weapons it might be inadvisable to assault except in fact the offensive nation holds weapons of an identical nature.
The role of military defence has been gradually shifted away from its primary role of providing security to enhancing commercial interest. With industrial growth and advancement of science,technology and Avionics the defence production led to a market oriented producer- purchaser relation between the developed and developing countries.The poor nation afflicted with conflicts became a super market for defence deals. For the powerful, military prowess which was earlier synonymous with political power has become a trademark of economic power.
Nowhere is this example extra outlined than within the Cold War stand offs of the mid to late twentieth century. One specific example of that is the Cuban Missile Crisis which involved the US and the Soviet Union in 1962. The Soviet and Cuban authorities had positioned nuclear weapons on Cuba as seen by American reconnaissance planes and, with the stress between the 2 nations already palpable, a standoff ensued with the 'very actual' menace of a nuclear warfare occurring. Luckily diplomatic proceedings ensured that the disaster was settled relatively amicably with the dismantling of the weaponry and a no-invasion settlement in place from the American authorities.
But restraining factors were at work. The intellectual circle and the knowledge acquired from past experiences as also the active international diplomacy successfully trained the world community to disarm for peace and development. The agreement to network for wealth through friendly trades and to address conflicts through peaceful dialogues have been endorsed vehemently.
Resource is scarce and is even scarcer with rising population particularly in poor countries which are already afflicted with hunger, illiteracy and joblessness. For these countries, the preparation for an impending war, which may never occur, is a sheer wastage of precious resource in terms of man, money and material.
The political compulsions may tempt the authority to take pride in the toughness of the defence force. The military men pride themselves as the savior of the country. With due respect and regard to the defence services, I have a considered opinion to express. I think military might is an outdated notion of exalting the national self esteem. Recent history of military powers have confirmed the fatality of this approach. The pride of the nation is in the human asset and any nation that failed to nurture its most precious asset will lose its national pride even if it owns the most sophisticated war weapons to erase the entire human race.
Big defence budgets in the developed world may entail an economic investment return out of defence production and sale exports. But how long can this go on? For poor countries, big defence budget produces a negative return, and hits the belly of the poor as his pie is taken away with every military purchase.In the new age, the defence security trade mark will diminish as more focus is now on economic security and sustainability of the future. The creative and innovative thinking to meet the future challenges will be a supreme consideration while war weapons will be valueless in the approaching apocalypse.You should definitely check Ctcd for more information.
There are some folks who believe that the United States goes out of its way to start wars, but is that really a fair assessment? No, not really, still it's not to say that a rogue nation-state despot or dictator should go out of their way to provoke us either. Not long ago, I was discussing this with an acquaintance, and they indicated that; "without wars, the defense industry would not exist in the end."
The thing is, they don't care what they build really; they just get a contract and set up a project management team, make prototypes, and then manufacture. They could make day-care centers for kids or military bases, they don't care. It's like lawyers, if they cannot practice one type of law, they will try to sue you for something else. We don't live in a world where there is not some crisis to take care of.
Further, I don't see nations with nukes as so bad, more I am worried about lunatic dictators, or terrorists having them. I'd rather the world didn't have nuclear weapons at all, but since so many nations do, and more will soon follow, I very much doubt any nation will get rid of them, because they will want to be able to protect themselves, against the last nation that refuses to get rid of them. Now then, my acquaintance states the obvious;
In my personal library I have almost a whole row of books on the topic of nuclear proliferation, the Cold War, and many reports put forth during the Cold War by the Rand Corporation. I believe it is scary stuff, and it's quite unfortunate, but it is what it is and we must deal with it without blinders. Please consider all this and think on it. If you have any comments, questions, or concerns you may e-mail me. I will not accept e-mails from anti-nuclear power activists.
The best military services info source- a website portal for teaching and talking.
Many people wonder - What is a learning portal? These days, it seems that everyone is finding ways to package and repackage information, but often one can find important pieces missing from the equation. For example, considering the current social, cultural and political climate, most people really want to learn around the different aspects life that they don’t readily understand. For those of you up to task of creating a relevant portal or learning facility there are a few things that you must take into account. This short article describes stops working the details for you using an air force portal as an example. A Defence learning portal really should have military articles that explore different aspects of military air Defence. These articles is usually free or paid but either way they need to cover all relevant topics in a way that is informative and discursive. Headlines should be short and engaging - much the same as is warranted in a newspaper. As far as film content, military videos should feature experts from various ranks of the military who are willing and able to share opinions and best practices. They should be willing to give case studies in order to ensure that students or users make the most of their presentations.
Some topics at these events include armoured vehicles, air defence and maritime security. Often a military forum where editors or contributors can conduct a military review of new technology is included. This also allows you to get ideas for new content as contributors are able to give timely input that will inform the editorial direction of the portal. These are generally only some of the tactics that organizations have used successfully to tackle the creation of learning portals. While this article uses military defence as an example, there is most definitely the opportunity transfer these lessons to other disciplines with strong positive impact. Once your web blog has been created, the next move is marketing that site and sharing it with your target market.
Before you do this however,You must learn and understand how to write an effective blog. Here are a couple of sound advice. Otherwise you should be very fairful for job loss, especially in cases where HR professionals use Redundancy Calculator to help them make their decisions. Those things are brutal to people who don't blog properly.
Something we’ve seen in on content websites is that when people write a vague topic title for a forum post, it gets very little response. When people are very clear and distinct about what they really want or what they’re talking about, they often get a lot of responses. This is also true with blogging. You’ve got precious few moments to grab someone’s attention. Lead with a useful and grabbing title.
The initial paragraph is all most people will give you to convince them to read, so if you’re going to use the above-mentioned method, be sure that you show people what they’re going to get from the post in that same paragraph.
After your story, extract out the important piece you’re hoping to talk about, and explain the concept. Use the simplest terms possible. Use simple sentences. Sometimes, we think that people want our most colorful and expressive writing. Usually, particularly in nonfiction, they want well-crafted and useful sentences.
If a chair’s pretty but you can’t sit on it, it’s not very much of a chair, is it? (Oh Military Blogs, you may begin bristling now.)
Explain the notion, and then help people start to see how they can use it to themselves. In a post about how to blog effectively, I’d explain that this formula, for example it is, helps people move towards actionable next steps, if you’re lucky enough to lay it out like that. Oh, and I’d point out that transitional sentences like this one help you move from the explanation into the actionable steps.
Try doing something like this:
Pick a topic
Come up with a title (it’s okay if you redo the title after the fact)
Find a graphic to accompany the piece ( I use Flickr for this).
Write a first paragraph that both explains the piece and/or tells us a story to do so. (This might take practice.)
Write the first main point and explain it to us. Make the best one come first. Don’t build us up to it.
Repeat if you have multiple points.
Give us actionable takeaways or a call to action.
Wrap up the piece however you want that call to action to go
I’ve been writing in some form or another for over 35 years (if you count my beginnings at age 5). I started winning awards for writing in high school. But it wasn’t until some time after 9/11 that I started getting decent at writing, and it wasn’t until around 2005 or so that I started convincing others that I had something that might be useful.
When inspiration for a post strikes, scribble it down in a notebook or a word file. For many bloggers and content creators, finding the topic to write about takes up half the time. Keeping an idea list lets you leap in to a new post quickly when you’re ready to write.
If you try to force yourself to come up with supporting information for your brilliant idea right away, it’s going to take ages. Let that topic sit for a few days, though, and you can add new ideas as they occurs to you - and when you’re ready to write, you’ll already have all the supporting info you need
You’ve probably got twice as many ideas as you need at this point, so it’s time to be brutal. Cut out any supporting idea that doesn’t fit with the main topic of the article. Remember, we’re talking about how to write an article in 20 minutes, not an epic. You can always use the ideas you don’t need for later posts
If you find that you’re stuck, don’t try to force the words to come. Save the article and work on something else for awhile. If inspiration strikes, open up that document again. You can even switch from one blog post to another, spending a few minutes on each as ideas comes to you. It’s a huge time-saver.
It’s tempting, when you look through your list of ideas be sure to visit Vinu, and remember to save the best ones for later because you think they’ll be easier to write. You don’t want to save time later, you want to save time now. Do the articles you know will come easily and make the most of that time.
The above methodology has served me well for a very long time in blogging, and it might prove useful to your efforts. Once you’ve practiced it a while, you could tweak and modify it to meet your own needs. Heck, it's likely you have an even better method you’d like to prescribe below in the comments. I’m all for it. But that which you see above is roughly how I do what I do. I hope it proves useful.
We’re a short while off from launching it, but it will offer some great interviews, a writing course, some accountability, some workshopping of your pieces (not just blog posts, mind you), and other related information. I think that writing has become so much more important for most jobs than it’s ever been, so this is one way that I can help out.
I’d love to hear your thoughts on what you’re working on, what you find challenging, and what would be useful in a course of that kind.
Also, remember to optimize. Pictures need to load very quickly as you only have a persons attention for a very short time before they bounce. Your picture is the first thing to load, and it took and incredible amount of time to load. This could cause you to loose a lot of readers even if your content is fantastic. Images need to load in a matter of seconds, and a good size is 72 dpi. If you are taking them straight from Flickr then they are not optimized properly to load. They are optimized to be printed much bigger with very high dpi (dots per inch). Your image choice was good.
As for what I find challenging, I used really bad post-anxiety. I would sit at the computer and my mind would be a blank. No ideas or post topics. Then I started planning Acenet
posts in advance and it became much easier. Right now I've got posts planned about a month in advance and it makes me feel so much better knowing that I have enough ideas up my sleeve to fill a whole month.
Some topics at these events include armoured vehicles, air defence and maritime security. Often a military forum where editors or contributors can conduct a military review of new technology is included. This also allows you to get ideas for new content as contributors are able to give timely input that will inform the editorial direction of the portal. These are generally only some of the tactics that organizations have used successfully to tackle the creation of learning portals. While this article uses military defence as an example, there is most definitely the opportunity transfer these lessons to other disciplines with strong positive impact. Once your web blog has been created, the next move is marketing that site and sharing it with your target market.
Before you do this however,You must learn and understand how to write an effective blog. Here are a couple of sound advice. Otherwise you should be very fairful for job loss, especially in cases where HR professionals use Redundancy Calculator to help them make their decisions. Those things are brutal to people who don't blog properly.
Something we’ve seen in on content websites is that when people write a vague topic title for a forum post, it gets very little response. When people are very clear and distinct about what they really want or what they’re talking about, they often get a lot of responses. This is also true with blogging. You’ve got precious few moments to grab someone’s attention. Lead with a useful and grabbing title.
The initial paragraph is all most people will give you to convince them to read, so if you’re going to use the above-mentioned method, be sure that you show people what they’re going to get from the post in that same paragraph.
After your story, extract out the important piece you’re hoping to talk about, and explain the concept. Use the simplest terms possible. Use simple sentences. Sometimes, we think that people want our most colorful and expressive writing. Usually, particularly in nonfiction, they want well-crafted and useful sentences.
If a chair’s pretty but you can’t sit on it, it’s not very much of a chair, is it? (Oh Military Blogs, you may begin bristling now.)
Explain the notion, and then help people start to see how they can use it to themselves. In a post about how to blog effectively, I’d explain that this formula, for example it is, helps people move towards actionable next steps, if you’re lucky enough to lay it out like that. Oh, and I’d point out that transitional sentences like this one help you move from the explanation into the actionable steps.
Try doing something like this:
Pick a topic
Come up with a title (it’s okay if you redo the title after the fact)
Find a graphic to accompany the piece ( I use Flickr for this).
Write a first paragraph that both explains the piece and/or tells us a story to do so. (This might take practice.)
Write the first main point and explain it to us. Make the best one come first. Don’t build us up to it.
Repeat if you have multiple points.
Give us actionable takeaways or a call to action.
Wrap up the piece however you want that call to action to go
I’ve been writing in some form or another for over 35 years (if you count my beginnings at age 5). I started winning awards for writing in high school. But it wasn’t until some time after 9/11 that I started getting decent at writing, and it wasn’t until around 2005 or so that I started convincing others that I had something that might be useful.
When inspiration for a post strikes, scribble it down in a notebook or a word file. For many bloggers and content creators, finding the topic to write about takes up half the time. Keeping an idea list lets you leap in to a new post quickly when you’re ready to write.
If you try to force yourself to come up with supporting information for your brilliant idea right away, it’s going to take ages. Let that topic sit for a few days, though, and you can add new ideas as they occurs to you - and when you’re ready to write, you’ll already have all the supporting info you need
You’ve probably got twice as many ideas as you need at this point, so it’s time to be brutal. Cut out any supporting idea that doesn’t fit with the main topic of the article. Remember, we’re talking about how to write an article in 20 minutes, not an epic. You can always use the ideas you don’t need for later posts
If you find that you’re stuck, don’t try to force the words to come. Save the article and work on something else for awhile. If inspiration strikes, open up that document again. You can even switch from one blog post to another, spending a few minutes on each as ideas comes to you. It’s a huge time-saver.
It’s tempting, when you look through your list of ideas be sure to visit Vinu, and remember to save the best ones for later because you think they’ll be easier to write. You don’t want to save time later, you want to save time now. Do the articles you know will come easily and make the most of that time.
The above methodology has served me well for a very long time in blogging, and it might prove useful to your efforts. Once you’ve practiced it a while, you could tweak and modify it to meet your own needs. Heck, it's likely you have an even better method you’d like to prescribe below in the comments. I’m all for it. But that which you see above is roughly how I do what I do. I hope it proves useful.
We’re a short while off from launching it, but it will offer some great interviews, a writing course, some accountability, some workshopping of your pieces (not just blog posts, mind you), and other related information. I think that writing has become so much more important for most jobs than it’s ever been, so this is one way that I can help out.
I’d love to hear your thoughts on what you’re working on, what you find challenging, and what would be useful in a course of that kind.
Also, remember to optimize. Pictures need to load very quickly as you only have a persons attention for a very short time before they bounce. Your picture is the first thing to load, and it took and incredible amount of time to load. This could cause you to loose a lot of readers even if your content is fantastic. Images need to load in a matter of seconds, and a good size is 72 dpi. If you are taking them straight from Flickr then they are not optimized properly to load. They are optimized to be printed much bigger with very high dpi (dots per inch). Your image choice was good.
As for what I find challenging, I used really bad post-anxiety. I would sit at the computer and my mind would be a blank. No ideas or post topics. Then I started planning Acenet
posts in advance and it became much easier. Right now I've got posts planned about a month in advance and it makes me feel so much better knowing that I have enough ideas up my sleeve to fill a whole month.
Friday, April 15, 2011
Avionics - What an Industry
Avionics for defence is much different from that of non-military units. Airplaine mechanics usually approve the changes before new avionics are installed. It is always best to get their opinions. This may go in the direction of growing the reliability and maintainability of an installation. Avionics is defined as the science and know-how of electronics applied to aeronautics and astronautics.
All aircraft is concerned with aeronautics. Airlines and Military Aircraft maunfacturers (who manufacture for defence) spend a great deal of money on tricking out their cockpits Not every airline can do it. An airline would possibly load 1,000,000 dollars' price of computers and electronics - or avionics - right into a cockpit, accounting for as much as 10 p.c of the airplane's price.Driving a record wave of business airplane orders, the avionics trade has grown about 20 p.c annually for the previous three years. As the electronics develop extra prominence, so do the firms that make them. Slightly than merely supplying black bins to be plugged into the cockpit, the companies now design whole cockpit layouts, working on new airplane fashions from the outset.
Three U.S. companies are top dog in the avionics industry: Bendix/King, a division of the Allied Signal Aerospace Firm; Collins Avionics, a division of the Rockwell Worldwide Company, and Honeywell Inc. All three are enjoying record growth. The most important international challenge to America's dominance is coming from France. The quantity of American electronics on Airbus jets is shrinking. Though Japanese electronics may fill American households, they're almost absent from airline cockpits. Japanese firms supply only the semiconductor chips and different components.
In the avionics market, there are really very few things that are kept secret or hush-hush. A lot of the know-how is developed within the army and quickly enters the public domain. A product's shelf life is shrinking, as corporations play technological leapfrog. With most of their gross sales dependent on the booming industrial airplane business, the avionics makers have turn out to be much less weak to protection cuts. ''These corporations may be like chameleons, shifting from protection to business merchandise,'' stated Paul Nisbet, an analyst with Prudential-Bache Inc.If they want to remain strong companies they must expand their reaches. The avionics and aeronitics industry is It is not easy for a company to survive in the avionics world if they don't struggle and work for thier gains. The challenging nature of the industry remains a constant today.
The industry's most dramatic advance came in the late 1970's with the advent of the computerized ''glass'' cockpit Pc tools turned small and light enough to hold aloft. Engineers consolidated dozens of instruments onto six computer-backed cathode-ray tubes. Pilots may verify altitude, speed and direction on video displays quite than the more temperamental mechanical gauges. For communications, radios that failed every 2,500 hours, on average, have been replaced with fashions that last 12,000 hours.
The largest benefit of the glass cockpit is that the black packing containers can communicate to 1 another. It's important that that this be a feature of all aircraft. Black boxes exist to give data about how the aircraft functions and if it can't communicate well with the other technology in the aircraft's cockpit then this makes it very difficult to investigate issues. The on-board computer systems can assess an altitude for the greatest gas effectivity and the autopilot can guide the plane there.One of the big pushes in aviation and military is to have common cockpit designs, which are ergonomically correct.With this, pilots would be able to fly pretty much any aircraft. (Can you imagine how annoying it would be to live in a world where everyone could easily fly a plane though?)I can just imagine it now - yes cousin Jimmy I see you flying!
There are other benefits as well. Taken to extreme this would mean your vehicle or a commercial truck would be equivalent to a war fighting tank, military aircraft jet airliner, private boat, fighter jet, helicopter and school bus.Let's look at this example. Using cars as a metaphore really illuminates the situation If we borrow a friend's car we are constantly looking for where stuff is, where is the hood release, fuel hatch release and how the hell do I turn off this G-Dang windshield wiper?We would find it hard to drive another car without geting to know it first. As machines get more complicated and humans become more brain dead due to bad use of natural selection, we will need counter these issues with better designed standardization such is being done in the CCI. Check out this fantastic article that delves more deeply into the Avionics World: BLS
That's why it makes all the sense in the world to have these cockpits look the same. It doesn't matter if it is costly Naturally the controversy surrounding whether to go forward with with one unified cockpit design plan. So it is still anyone's guess as to whether the aviation industry willl come to a consensus on cockpit design. Many industry members have started to work more closely to bring this unified approach to fruition. However, it is not an easy acheivement. We'll just have to see what happens.
All aircraft is concerned with aeronautics. Airlines and Military Aircraft maunfacturers (who manufacture for defence) spend a great deal of money on tricking out their cockpits Not every airline can do it. An airline would possibly load 1,000,000 dollars' price of computers and electronics - or avionics - right into a cockpit, accounting for as much as 10 p.c of the airplane's price.Driving a record wave of business airplane orders, the avionics trade has grown about 20 p.c annually for the previous three years. As the electronics develop extra prominence, so do the firms that make them. Slightly than merely supplying black bins to be plugged into the cockpit, the companies now design whole cockpit layouts, working on new airplane fashions from the outset.
Three U.S. companies are top dog in the avionics industry: Bendix/King, a division of the Allied Signal Aerospace Firm; Collins Avionics, a division of the Rockwell Worldwide Company, and Honeywell Inc. All three are enjoying record growth. The most important international challenge to America's dominance is coming from France. The quantity of American electronics on Airbus jets is shrinking. Though Japanese electronics may fill American households, they're almost absent from airline cockpits. Japanese firms supply only the semiconductor chips and different components.
In the avionics market, there are really very few things that are kept secret or hush-hush. A lot of the know-how is developed within the army and quickly enters the public domain. A product's shelf life is shrinking, as corporations play technological leapfrog. With most of their gross sales dependent on the booming industrial airplane business, the avionics makers have turn out to be much less weak to protection cuts. ''These corporations may be like chameleons, shifting from protection to business merchandise,'' stated Paul Nisbet, an analyst with Prudential-Bache Inc.If they want to remain strong companies they must expand their reaches. The avionics and aeronitics industry is It is not easy for a company to survive in the avionics world if they don't struggle and work for thier gains. The challenging nature of the industry remains a constant today.
The industry's most dramatic advance came in the late 1970's with the advent of the computerized ''glass'' cockpit Pc tools turned small and light enough to hold aloft. Engineers consolidated dozens of instruments onto six computer-backed cathode-ray tubes. Pilots may verify altitude, speed and direction on video displays quite than the more temperamental mechanical gauges. For communications, radios that failed every 2,500 hours, on average, have been replaced with fashions that last 12,000 hours.
The largest benefit of the glass cockpit is that the black packing containers can communicate to 1 another. It's important that that this be a feature of all aircraft. Black boxes exist to give data about how the aircraft functions and if it can't communicate well with the other technology in the aircraft's cockpit then this makes it very difficult to investigate issues. The on-board computer systems can assess an altitude for the greatest gas effectivity and the autopilot can guide the plane there.One of the big pushes in aviation and military is to have common cockpit designs, which are ergonomically correct.With this, pilots would be able to fly pretty much any aircraft. (Can you imagine how annoying it would be to live in a world where everyone could easily fly a plane though?)I can just imagine it now - yes cousin Jimmy I see you flying!
There are other benefits as well. Taken to extreme this would mean your vehicle or a commercial truck would be equivalent to a war fighting tank, military aircraft jet airliner, private boat, fighter jet, helicopter and school bus.Let's look at this example. Using cars as a metaphore really illuminates the situation If we borrow a friend's car we are constantly looking for where stuff is, where is the hood release, fuel hatch release and how the hell do I turn off this G-Dang windshield wiper?We would find it hard to drive another car without geting to know it first. As machines get more complicated and humans become more brain dead due to bad use of natural selection, we will need counter these issues with better designed standardization such is being done in the CCI. Check out this fantastic article that delves more deeply into the Avionics World: BLS
That's why it makes all the sense in the world to have these cockpits look the same. It doesn't matter if it is costly Naturally the controversy surrounding whether to go forward with with one unified cockpit design plan. So it is still anyone's guess as to whether the aviation industry willl come to a consensus on cockpit design. Many industry members have started to work more closely to bring this unified approach to fruition. However, it is not an easy acheivement. We'll just have to see what happens.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)